Introduction

When solar households look for the best returns, two common options appear: installing a battery or switching to a plan with a higher feed-in tariff (FiT). Both approaches can improve your bill savings, but the winner depends on your usage, location, and export volumes. This guide runs through the basics, worked examples, and tools to help you decide.

If you’re new to solar exports, start with What is FiT? before comparing options.

Key Definitions

See state-based FiT levels here: Compare FiT by State.

 

solar cells system on the green world 3d rendering

Worked Example 1 — Higher FiT, No Battery

Daily savings:

Worked Example 2 — Lower FiT, With Battery

Daily savings:

In this case, the battery option saves more despite a lower FiT.

Worked Example 3 — High FiT vs Mid-size Battery

Plan A: 15c FiT, no battery → Export 15 kWh × 15c = $2.25
Plan B: 7c FiT + 5 kWh battery → Battery use 5 × 30c = $1.50 + Export 10 × 7c = $0.70 = $2.20
Here, the high FiT plan slightly edges out the battery scenario.

Run your own numbers with the Solar ROI & FiT tool.

Why the Outcome Varies

Always review plan details at Retailer Rates.

Tools to Compare Options

FAQs

Q1. Is a higher FiT always better than a battery?
Not always. A high FiT helps heavy exporters, while batteries help households with high evening usage.

Q2. Do batteries pay off faster with low FiTs?
Yes. The lower the FiT, the more valuable it is to store power instead of exporting it.

Q3. Can I combine both — battery and higher FiT?
Yes, but battery discharge reduces exports, so you may not benefit much from a higher FiT plan.

Q4. Should I wait for battery prices to fall?
If payback is long in your state, waiting could make sense. Use Solar ROI & FiT to check.

Conclusion

The choice between a battery or higher FiT depends on your solar generation, export share, and retailer plan. Batteries usually win in high-tariff states with low FiTs, while high FiT plans can compete strongly if your export volumes are large.

Next steps: